This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin service account (Re: inetd help)
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 16:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 17 10:40, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > Are there bad reasons for not just calling this account "root"?
> >
> > A while back I thought this is a good idea, but not anymore.
> >
> > The account is a service-starter account only. Nothing else should be
> > done with this account and the installation script actually forbids
> > this account to be used for logon. I don't want people to get the wrong
> > idea what this account is for. I know from earlier discussions that
> > some people are already using the root account name as a substitute
> > for some Admin account, or that some people are already created a root
> > account on their machines. I can easily imagine what happens next after
> > we occupied the root account name for the service-starter account.
>
> Having said that, the account name is still open for discussion of
> course. If everybody except me thinks "root" is a good idea, so be it.
FWIW, I'd go with "daemon" (or, as a second choice, "server"). I agree
with your reasoning about "root", and, IMO, "cygwin_server" is too long.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"