codepage:utf8... do we still need it?
Charles Wilson
cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm
Wed Mar 18 05:12:00 GMT 2009
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Does anybody have an idea if we could get rid of codepage:ansi/oem
> entirely? Do we need it at all? I'm not quite sure what the OEM
> codepage is still good for. I'm wondering if using the ANSI code page
> in case __locale_charset () isn't UTF-8 should be sufficient, now that
> all file and console operations are using wide char functions anyway.
> But that's the problem, I'm not at all sure I understand that right.
The only thing I can think of, is that you used to have to set
codepage:oem in order to get linedraw characters in ncurses-based
applications, when running in a cmd box.
I just tried it in all six modes:
codepage:ansi
codepage:oem x cygwin-1.5
<nothing> cygwin-1.7
and I got the box characters in every case. So, THAT isn't a reason to
keep codepage: around.
--
Chuck
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list