-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of One Angry User
Sent: 06 December 2004 14:13
To: Talk Amongst Yourselves
Subject: Re: typical cygwin bug communications (long)
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I am trying to compile openoffice and it says "syntax error".
Please help!
When will the port be finished?
Gerrit
Yeah, I want my OpenOffice NOW! You Cygwin guys SUCK! Why
can't you be
more like LINUX?!!! And don't tell me that you're MEAN -- I
KNOW you are!
O. A. User
The Lusers Forum
--
`. The 50-line signature with a meaningless legal disclaimer
goes here .'
Your socks are showing! You can't hide from me behind an X-X- header!
Received: from unknown (HELO slinky.cs.nyu.edu) (128.122.20.14)
by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 14:12:45 -0000
Heh, you didn't even bother to use an open proxy in Argentina or Korea.
Amateur!
Damn, M$ Outlook is clueless[*]. If I hit "Reply all" to that post, I get a
reply with just one address in the To: header, "Talk Amongst Yourselves". But
if I only hit the single "Reply" button, I get a reply with two addresses in it,
"Talk Amongst Yourselves" and the "Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop" one as well.
So Microsoft must reckon 1 > 2.
Maybe it's going to be part of their new advertising campaign:
Freedom is Slavery.
War is Peace.
Ignorance is strength.
Reply to author is Reply to all.
Bill Brother is watching you!
cheers,
DaveK
[*] Ok, ok, I know that's stating the obvious: what I mean is "..even _more_
clueless than we already knew it to be..."