This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Dumb Outlook (Was RE: typical cygwin bug communications (long))
- From: "Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>
- To: "'quick! hide behind this sheet of glass!'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:29:39 -0000
- Subject: RE: Dumb Outlook (Was RE: typical cygwin bug communications (long))
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: 06 December 2004 18:05
> To: Talk Amongst Yourselves
> Subject: Dumb Outlook (Was RE: typical cygwin bug
> communications (long))
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cygwin-talk-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> > > Sent: 06 December 2004 16:17
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Damn, M$ Outlook is clueless[*]. If I hit "Reply all" to that
> > > > post, I get a reply with just one address in the To:
> header, "Talk
> > > > Amongst Yourselves". But if I only hit the single
> "Reply" button, I
> > > > get a reply with two addresses in it, "Talk Amongst
> Yourselves" and
> > > > the "Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop" one as well.
> > >
> > > So don't use Outlook... ];->
> >
> > False inference! Where does it say I _mind_ if that
> happens? I just
> > think it's clueless. Most cats and dogs are clueless, but that's no
> > reason not to keep pets.....
>
> Cats also scratch furniture. I won't go into details on what
> untrained puppies do.
You don't need to. There's nothing you could tell me about it that I haven't
already stepped in at some time in the past!
> > > > So Microsoft must reckon 1 > 2.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it's going to be part of their new advertising campaign:
> > > >
> > > > Freedom is Slavery.
> > > > War is Peace.
> > > > Ignorance is strength.
> > > > Reply to author is Reply to all.
> > > >
> > > > Bill Brother is watching you!
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > DaveK
> > > >
> > > > [*] Ok, ok, I know that's stating the obvious: what I
> mean is "..even
> > > > _more_ clueless than we already knew it to be..."
> > >
> > > And you're still using it because ________________________ <-
> >
> > What else would give me so many laughs _and_
> opportunities to fling
> > opprobrium at Microsoft?
>
> You can do this without suffering Outlook on your computer. :-)
Look, there's no need to worry, I assure you :) It's Outlook that's suffering
on my computer, not me!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....