This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)
Quite interesting indeed!
Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x (cygwin), etc
against the gcc2.9x vintage?
H.
"chris" <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk">news:407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk...
> Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> > ========================================
> > Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers
> > C/C++ Performance Tests
> > =========================================
> >
> >
> >
> <snip>
>
> While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really
> running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what
> differences are due to startup time and due to runtime. How about a
> couple of extra jobs, one of which runs for 1 minute and one for 2?
>
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/