[ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1

[Dave Korn]

René Berber wrote on 10 September 2008 23:29:

> Hi,
> 
> Has anyone tested it?

  Well, yeah :) 
 
> Can't compile a simple test:

  Can't reproduce:

/tmp/gcc4 $ cat test.c
int
main ()
{

  ;
  return 0;
}

@_______. .
(       /"\
 ||--||(___)
 '"  '"'---'
/tmp/gcc4 $ gcc test.c ; echo $?
0
@_______. .
(       /"\
 ||--||(___)
 '"  '"'---'
/tmp/gcc4 $ ./a.exe ; echo $?
0
@_______. .
(       /"\
 ||--||(___)
 '"  '"'---'
/tmp/gcc4 $

> Fails at that point, the assembler file was not created, or the pass
> deleted it, no dll's missing:
> 
> $ cygcheck /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.0/cc1.exe
> C:\cygwin/lib\gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.0/cc1.exe
>   C:\Cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
>     C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL
>       C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll
>         C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>       C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll
>         C:\WINDOWS\system32\Secur32.dll
>   C:\Cygwin\bin\cyggmp-3.dll
>   C:\Cygwin\bin\cygmpfr-1.dll
> 
> Any special requirements on binutils?  I have a recent version, but
> there's one in experimental.

  Nah, nothing like that.  Cygcheck output show anything?  Traces of v3
remaining and interfering?


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/